Food Safety Testing Market By Testing Type (Pathogen Testing, GMO Testing, Allergen Testing, Mycotoxin Testing, Chemical & Pesticide Testing, Heavy Metals Testing, Others), By Technology (PCR-Based Testing, Immunoassay-Based Testing, Chromatography & Spectrometry, Biosensors, Others), By Food Tested (Meat, Poultry, and Seafood, Dairy Products, Processed Food, Fruits & Vegetables, Cereals & Grains, Baby Food, Others), By Contaminant (Microbiological Contaminants, Chemical Contaminants, Allergens, Genetically Modified Organisms, Others), and By End User (Food Manufacturers, Food Service Providers, Government & Regulatory Bodies, Independent Testing Laboratories, Retailers, Others), Global Market Size, Segmental analysis, Regional Overview, Company share analysis, Leading Company Profiles And Market Forecast, 2025 – 2035

---

What trends will shape Food Safety Testing Market in the coming years?

The Food Safety Testing Market accounted for USD 24.89 Billion in 2024 and USD 26.82 Billion in 2025 is expected to reach USD 56.63 Billion by 2035, growing at a CAGR of around 7.76% between 2025 and 2035. The food safety testing market is the process of analysing food products to find any type of food contaminant pathogens, chemicals, GMOs, or allergens to allay any compliances that food falls within safety standards and regulations. Rising foodborne diseases, strict government laws, and greater consumer concerns about food quality are the drivers of this market. It covers many testing technologies, such as rapid testing and conventional and modern molecular methodologies. Major end-users include the meat, dairy, processed food, and beverage industries. Increased global trade and globalisation in food and packaged food demand also boost the growth.

What do industry experts say about the Food Safety Testing market trends?

“A rigorous, risk-based testing program—including pathogen detection, allergen assays, and environmental monitoring—is essential to ensure food safety and prevent outbreaks.”

• Dr. Ann Marie McNamara, PhD, Former VP of Food Safety & Quality, US Foods and Microbiologist with USDA & CDC

Which segments and geographies does the report analyze?

What are the key drivers and challenges shaping the Food Safety Testing market?

How does globalization influence contamination tracking within food trade systems?

Globalisation also plays quite an important role in the realm of contamination tracking in the sector of food trade and makes the processes of the supply chain much more complicated and challenges a person with a higher risk of cross-border contamination cases. With different food products passing across several countries, which also have diverse food safety rules, there is an increased risk of cross-transmission of foodborne pathogens and a need for more competent and aligned testing infrastructure. The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that more than 600 million people around the world get sick annually after eating contaminated food, and there is a rising international trade as one of the factors.

The CDC (U.S.) finds that imported foods are associated with an increased percentage of foodborne illness outbreaks in the USA, emphasising a strict regime of tests. Statistics on the global food trade portray a figure of more than 1.6 trillion U.S. dollars in annual turnover, strengthening the reality of mechanisms to monitor contamination through uniform monitoring procedures. The following is complex due to this globalisation, which has in turn led to investment in rapid testing, traceability, and regulatory partnership that would prevent an outbreak on a large scale and defend community health.

Will technological innovation enhance efficiency of allergen screening procedures?

Advances in technology are significantly improving the efficiency of the food safety testing market through allergen screening procedures. The emergence of such advancements in developing technology as biosensors, PCR, and next-generation sequencing has strengthened the capability to detect food allergens with speed, precision, and sensitivity. For instance, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration features the increasing application of real-time PCR to detect allergens because it has both high sensitivity and specificity.

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, to illustrate, reveals that nearly 32 million Americans experience food allergies, which further proves the necessity to have effective and consistent testing. Labs are responding to this by adapting automation and AI-based diagnostic platforms to eradicate human error and shorten the time required to conduct tests. These technologies are used to help conform to the strict international food safety laws, such as the Food Safety Modernisation Act. Hence, the turnaround times of testing have been minimised, and the detection limits have been enhanced, which has made the food supply chain more secure and transparent.

Might limited infrastructure slow development in under-resourced geographic areas?

Lack of infrastructure in the under-invested geographic regions also forms a critical impediment to the growth of the food safety testing market. To give an example of the same, the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) has observed that most of the developing countries have a shortage of accredited laboratories and trained personnel and reliable cold chains, which are a critical element in the testing and monitoring of food-associated hazards. A report by the government of India noted that, among the 82 laboratories evaluated in the country in the testing of foods, many had nonstandardised lab equipment and poor power supply reliability, which complicated their test capacity (Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, 2022).

A study by the National Centre of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) stated that only approximately 30% of laboratories in some regions in Sub-Saharan Africa were able to operate on the minimum criteria because of the poor infrastructure in the region and the non-uniform funding allocation. These restrictions pose problems in identifying the contaminants as early as possible, thus hampering the quick execution of the food safety laws and the market potential growth in such regions. In developing economies, scaling up food safety testing and consequent sustenance of population health is conditional on tough infrastructure such as transport, power, and digital systems.

How can blockchain improve traceability across entire agricultural supply chains?

Blockchain can be a powerful tool to increase traceability through the agricultural supply chain, leaving a non-editable, clear record of all transactions along the farm-to-fork chain. This enhances the food safety system because an outbreak is identified quickly to determine the source of contamination. As such, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cites blockchain as a key technology in its New Era of Smarter Food Safety effort, having the ability to track foods in seconds rather than days.

A report by a study conducted by the University of Arkansas indicated that the implementation of blockchain in food supply chains resulted in the time to trace a product down to 2.2 seconds compared to 7 days. Such a degree of traceability reduces food fraud, eliminates massive recalls, and increases consumer confidence. Moreover, it also assists the relevant regulatory authorities in implementing safety standards in a more effective manner due to the availability of data in real time. With the growth in global food trade, the inclusion of blockchain will enhance the quality control of products, especially in dairy, meat, and fresh produce, as they are perishable and, therefore, high risk.

Could AI-driven diagnostics revolutionize real-time foodborne illness surveillance?

AI-powered diagnostics can significantly transform surveillance of real-time foodborne illnesses because they foster quicker detection, predictive analysis, and focused intervention during an outbreak. Conventional techniques usually incur delays in sample processing and communication, but AI has the potential to analyse datasets, even those involving many variables, in hospitals, supply chains, and laboratories, within a matter of seconds.

The CDC claims that about 48 million individuals in the United States get infected by foodborne diseases every year, causing about 128,000 individuals to be hospitalised, 3,000 of whom die. By using AI in diagnosis, it is possible that these figures can be minimised significantly because the initial sources of contamination can be detected and contaminants identified extremely quickly.

A study published in 2022 by the Centre of Food Safety and Security Systems at the University of Maryland paid particular attention to the use of machine learning in increasing outbreak predictability levels up to 80%. With the heightening complexity of food systems, the proactive, scalable means of balancing food safety and the resilience of public health is AI.

What are the key market segments in the Food Safety Testing industry?

Based on the Testing Type, the Food Safety Testing Market is classified into Pathogen Testing, GMO Testing, Allergen Testing, Mycotoxin Testing, Chemical & Pesticide Testing, Heavy Metals Testing, and Others. Pathogen testing represents the most relevant and prominent of the categories of testing in the food safety testing market. The first one is based on the fact that the presence of such pathogens as Salmonella, E. coli, and Listeria causes immediate and severe health hazards to consumers and results in foodborne diseases and a foodborne outbreak. Government agencies across the globe focus on pathogen detection as a way of maintaining the safety of people and their testing techniques. As a result, the pathogen testing market has become the leader as it seeks to meet high standards of safety and maintain brand image through its investments by food manufacturers and suppliers.

Based on the Technology, the Food Safety Testing Market is classified into PCR-Based Testing, Immunoassay-Based Testing, Chromatography & Spectrometry, Biosensors, and Others. PCR-based testing is the most marked and widespread technology in the food safety testing market. Since PCR (polymerase chain reaction) has been proven to be a highly sensitive, quick, and specific method of detecting pathogens and contaminants at the level of DNA, it is invaluable in ensuring safety in food. The fact that it gets precise results within a short period facilitates the timely decision-making in food production/supply channels. The growing regulation demands and early detection of contamination result in faster market penetration of PCR-based tests, which have become entrenched in the market.

Which regions are leading the Food Safety Testing market, and why?

The North American food safety testing market is dominated because the region maintains high regulations, developed technology infrastructure, and puts much focus on the health of consumers. Testing requirements by many regulatory bodies, including the FDA and USDA, are high, and consistent testing is required throughout the food chain. There are numerous players and research institutions based in the region that are investing in innovation, not least rapid testing strategies and automation. Burgeoning foodborne diseases, increasing volume of packaged food products, and regular product recalls are additional factors favouring market expansion.

The U.S. and Canada have fully developed food export markets, which necessitate satisfactory adherence to international food safety regulations, which in turn augments the demand for test services. The market gets propelled by the growing population's awareness of food quality and the usage of the most advanced analytics tools to detect types of contamination. Strategic partnerships between government agencies and the private sector facilitate the improvement of testing procedures and improvement of food safety in the area.

The Asia-Pacific food safety testing market is driven by the high industrialisation, urbanisation, and growing intricacy of food supply chains. As consumers become more educated and governments become more stringent about the regulation of food products in countries like China, India, Japan, and Australia, there has been a rapid increase in the need for accurate and efficient food safety testing. The exploding food and beverage industry in the region, with common outbreaks of foodborne illnesses, has compelled governments and manufacturers to invest in sound testing systems.

With the growth in technology and the vast spread of international trade, there is all the more reason to adhere to the international safety requirements. The availability of bulk agricultural production and the presence of food processing industries in Asia-Pacific make the region more flexible to food safety and a prime location in terms of food safety testing services and innovations. Since the region is investing more and more into research and development with a rising usage of partnerships between the governments and the individual sectors, it has caused a continued growth of the food safety testing market across the Asia-Pacific region.

What does the competitive landscape of the Food Safety Testing market look like?

The food safety testing market is very competitive and controlled with a blend of worldwide testing mega-suppliers and testing specialists. The other important players are SGS Group, Eurofins Scientific SE, Bureau Veritas, and Intertek, which are still in the process of growing and developing their operations by enlarging their testing labs and identifying new geographical locations by acquisition and alliances.

Thermo Fisher Scientific and the Neogen Corporation are some of the companies that are heavily invested in advanced forms of testing technology, such as rapid pathogen identification and molecular diagnosis, to be used in response to the rising requirements and expectations of food quality by the regulatory boards and consumers. Other recent changes have involved the use of AI and blockchain in traceability and data accuracy of the testing data to provide greater transparency across supply chains.

Mid-sized independent labs like Microbac Laboratories and EMSL Analytical are increasing their market pieces with very personalised testing services to local and regional food manufacturers. Such a dynamic environment demonstrates a wider movement in food safety initiatives towards modernisation and digitalisation of food safety systems, with rising food safety concerns on a global scale.

Food Safety Testing Market, Company Shares Analysis, 2024

To explore in-depth analysis in this report - Request Sample Report

Which recent mergers, acquisitions, or product launches are shaping the Food Safety Testing industry?

• In March 2025, Food Safety Net Services (FSNS) opened a new 24/7 food safety testing laboratory in St. Louis, Missouri, to expand its microbiology, analytical chemistry, and contract research services. The new facility strengthened testing capacity for local food and beverage manufacturers.

Report Coverage:

By Testing Type

• Pathogen Testing
• GMO Testing
• Allergen Testing
• Mycotoxin Testing
• Chemical & Pesticide Testing
• Heavy Metals Testing
• Others

By Technology

• PCR-Based Testing
• Immunoassay-Based Testing
• Chromatography & Spectrometry
• Biosensors
• Others

By Food Tested

• Meat, Poultry, and Seafood
• Dairy Products
• Processed Food
• Fruits & Vegetables
• Cereals & Grains
• Baby Food
• Others

By Contaminant

• Microbiological Contaminants
• Chemical Contaminants
• Allergens
• Genetically Modified Organisms
• Others

By End User

• Food Manufacturers
• Food Service Providers
• Government & Regulatory Bodies
• Independent Testing Laboratories
• Retailers
• Others

By Region

North America

• U.S.
• Canada

Europe

• U.K.
• France
• Germany
• Italy
• Spain
• Rest of Europe

Asia Pacific

• China
• Japan
• India
• Australia
• South Korea
• Singapore
• Rest of Asia Pacific

Latin America

• Brazil
• Argentina
• Mexico
• Rest of Latin America

Middle East & Africa

• GCC Countries
• South Africa
• Rest of Middle East & Africa

List of Companies:

• SGS Group
• Eurofins Scientific SE
• Bureau Veritas Group S.A.
• Intertek Group PLC
• ALS Limited
• TÜV SÜD AG
• NSF International
• Institut Mérieux
• AsureQuality Limited
• Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
• EMSL Analytical, Inc.
• Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
• Neogen Corporation
• Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
• Romer Labs

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)